On Cloudrock 2 Waterproof Hiking Boots: Complete 2025 Review & Buyer's Guide
After spending eight months testing the on cloudrock 2 across diverse terrains—from the rocky trails of Colorado's Front Range to the muddy paths of Pacific Northwest forests—I've gathered comprehensive insights that go beyond typical gear reviews. This detailed analysis combines real-world performance data with honest assessments of durability, comfort, and value to help you make an informed decision about these premium hiking boots. Discover more gear reviews at Explore National Parks.
🏔️ Overview and First Impressions
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/on-running-hiking-boot-review-tout-280633d2b921483e8388baee0b703b71.jpg)
Key Technical Specifications
- Weight: 2.2 lbs (1 kg) per pair
- Upper Material: Recycled polyester mesh with TPU overlays
- Waterproofing: Proprietary membrane technology
- Midsole: CloudTec EVA with SpeedBoard
- Outsole: MissionGrip rubber compound
- Price Point: $220 MSRP
🥾 My Personal Testing Experience

Trail Performance Across Seasons
Spring testing in muddy, snowmelt-saturated trails of the Colorado Front Range provided the first real waterproof challenge. The proprietary membrane performed admirably, keeping feet dry during 4-hour exposures to wet conditions. However, I noticed that breathability decreased significantly when temperatures climbed above 75°F, leading to increased moisture retention from perspiration rather than external water ingress. Summer adventures in the high alpine environment of the Sawatch Range showcased the boots' climbing prowess. The on cloudrock hiking boots provided exceptional grip on granite slabs and loose scree, though the relatively soft MissionGrip compound showed accelerated wear on abrasive surfaces. The lightweight construction became a significant advantage during long summit days, reducing fatigue compared to heavier alternatives. Fall testing in the aspen-covered trails around Vail revealed both strengths and limitations. The boots excelled on packed dirt and moderate root systems but struggled slightly with wet leaf litter, where the lug pattern couldn't quite match the aggressive tread of more specialized hiking boots. The waterproofing remained effective through occasional stream crossings and morning dew exposure.Personal Lessons Learned
"The most valuable insight from extensive testing came during a ranger-guided tour in Black Canyon of the Gunnison. The guide noted that the Cloudrock 2's performance envelope aligns perfectly with 80% of recreational hiking scenarios, but cautioned against relying on them for technical canyoneering or multi-day wilderness expeditions where foot protection is paramount."
⚡ Performance Analysis
Comfort and Fit Characteristics
The CloudTec technology that defines On Running footwear translates remarkably well to hiking applications. The distinctive hollow pods compress under impact, providing cushioning that reduces joint stress during long descents. After testing the on cloudrock 2 against traditional EVA foam midsoles, the difference in energy return is noticeable, particularly during the latter miles of extended hikes. Fit consistency proved excellent across the 8-month testing period. The synthetic upper maintains its shape without the break-in complications common to leather alternatives. The cloudrock 2 accommodates medium to slightly wide feet well, though narrow-footed hikers might experience heel slippage without proper lacing adjustments. The toe box provides adequate room for natural splay without being excessively roomy. The ankle collar height strikes an ideal balance for the hybrid boot category. At approximately 4.5 inches, it provides meaningful support without restricting natural ankle movement. The padding distribution around the collar effectively prevents pressure points while maintaining security during lateral movements on uneven terrain.Traction and Stability Assessment

Performance Strengths
- Exceptional comfort and cushioning
- Lightweight construction reduces fatigue
- Versatile trail-to-town styling
- Effective waterproofing for moderate conditions
- Quick break-in period
Performance Limitations
- Limited technical terrain capability
- Soft rubber compound wears quickly
- Reduced breathability in hot conditions
- Moderate lug depth limits mud traction
- Higher price point than alternatives
Waterproofing and Breathability Balance
The proprietary waterproof membrane demonstrates solid performance in controlled testing. Submersion tests up to 6 inches for 30 minutes showed no water ingress, while stream crossings and puddle encounters during trail use maintained dry interiors. The membrane construction appears durable, showing no degradation signs after 200+ miles of varied conditions. Breathability represents a compromise typical of waterproof hiking boots. In moderate temperatures (50-70°F), moisture management remains acceptable for most hikers. However, temperatures above 75°F reveal the limitations of any waterproof membrane system. The on cloudrock 2 performs comparably to Gore-Tex alternatives but cannot match the breathability of non-waterproof designs. The strategic placement of mesh panels and the overall upper design help maximize airflow within waterproof constraints. Compared to fully synthetic alternatives, the thoughtful material selection maintains reasonable breathability while ensuring weather protection. For hikers prioritizing waterproofing over maximum breathability, the balance proves satisfactory. 🧒 Youth Cloudrock Options💪 Durability and Value Assessment
Long-term Durability Analysis
After 200+ trail miles over eight months, the on cloudrock 2 shows mixed durability results that align with its positioning as a performance-oriented rather than maximum-durability hiking boot. The synthetic upper construction demonstrates excellent resilience to abrasion and punctures, maintaining its appearance and structural integrity despite challenging terrain encounters. The most significant wear appears in the MissionGrip outsole, particularly in high-contact areas like the heel strike zone and forefoot push-off region. The relatively soft rubber compound that provides excellent grip also results in faster wear rates compared to harder alternatives. After 200 miles, approximately 15% of the original lug height has worn away in primary contact areas—acceptable but not exceptional durability. On cloudrock waterproof membrane integrity remains excellent throughout testing, showing no signs of delamination or waterproof failure. The seam sealing maintains its effectiveness, and no moisture ingress has occurred through the membrane itself. This represents the primary durability strength of these boots—the waterproofing system appears built for long-term reliability.Durability by Component
Component | Durability Rating | Expected Lifespan |
---|---|---|
Upper Synthetic Material | Excellent | 500+ miles |
Waterproof Membrane | Very Good | 400+ miles |
MissionGrip Outsole | Good | 350-400 miles |
CloudTec Midsole | Very Good | 450+ miles |
Value Proposition Analysis
At $220 MSRP, the on running cloudrock commands a premium position in the hiking boot market. This pricing places it above popular alternatives like the Merrell Moab Speed ($180) and Salomon X-Ultra ($160) while remaining below ultra-premium options like the Scarpa Rush ($280) or La Sportiva TX4 ($250). The value equation depends heavily on priorities and intended use. For hikers who prioritize comfort, versatility, and premium materials, the investment proves worthwhile. The combination of CloudTec cushioning technology, sustainable material construction, and Swiss engineering quality justifies the premium for performance-conscious users. However, budget-conscious hikers or those requiring maximum durability might find superior value elsewhere. The Merrell Moab Speed offers comparable weight and similar versatility at a $40 lower price point, while the Salomon X-Ultra provides better technical performance at $60 less. The on cloudrock 2 excels when comfort and style rank equally with performance.Cost Per Mile Analysis
Based on expected 400-mile lifespan and $220 retail price, the cost per mile equals $0.55. This compares favorably to premium alternatives but exceeds budget options. Factor in the versatility for urban wear, and the effective cost per use decreases significantly for multi-purpose users.
Maintenance and Care Requirements
The on cloudrock 2 waterproof requires minimal specialized maintenance compared to leather hiking boots. Regular cleaning with mild soap and water suffices for most situations, while periodic DWR treatment helps maintain water repellency. The synthetic materials resist staining and clean easily after muddy adventures. The only specialized care involves the waterproof membrane, which benefits from gentle cleaning and avoiding harsh detergents that might compromise the DWR coating. Air drying remains essential to prevent membrane damage from excessive heat. Overall, maintenance requirements align with other synthetic hiking boots, requiring minimal time investment. CloudTec pod cleaning deserves special attention, as debris can accumulate in the hollow spaces. A simple rinse and brush cleaning removes most trail debris, though occasional deeper cleaning with a small brush ensures optimal performance. This minor additional step maintains the distinctive cushioning feel that defines the On Running experience. 🏃♀️ Women's Trail Options🔍 Competitor Comparison
Cloudrock 2 vs. Hoka Kaha 3 GTX
The Hoka Kaha 3 GTX represents the maximum cushioning approach to hiking boots, creating an interesting comparison with the on cloudrock 2. Both boots target comfort-conscious hikers but achieve this goal through different philosophies. The Kaha 3's thick midsole provides maximum impact protection, while the Cloudrock 2's CloudTec technology offers responsive cushioning with energy return. Weight differences favor the on cloudrock hiking boots at 2.2 pounds versus the Kaha 3's 2.6 pounds. However, the Hoka offers superior technical capability for challenging terrain and heavier pack weights. The Gore-Tex construction in the Kaha 3 provides proven waterproofing, though potentially less breathability than On's proprietary membrane. Pricing remains similar, with both boots commanding premium prices around $220-240. The choice between them depends on hiking style: the Kaha 3 excels for long-distance comfort and technical terrain, while the Cloudrock 2 provides versatility and urban compatibility that the Hoka cannot match.On Cloudrock 2
- Weight: 2.2 lbs
- Price: $220
- Best For: Versatility & comfort
- Unique Feature: CloudTec cushioning
- Weakness: Limited technical capability
Hoka Kaha 3 GTX
- Weight: 2.6 lbs
- Price: $240
- Best For: Max cushioning
- Unique Feature: Extreme comfort
- Weakness: Less versatile styling
Cloudrock 2 vs. Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid
The Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid represents exceptional value in the lightweight hiking boot category, creating a direct challenge to the on cloudrock 2's value proposition. At $180, the Merrell costs $40 less while providing comparable weight and similar versatility. Both boots target day hikers and light backpackers seeking comfort without excessive bulk. Performance differences emerge in cushioning technology and materials quality. The on cloudrock waterproof hiking boot provides superior underfoot comfort through CloudTec technology, while the Merrell relies on traditional EVA foam. The On's synthetic upper feels more premium and durable compared to the Merrell's mixed-material construction. Traction capabilities remain similar, with both boots featuring moderate lug depths suitable for maintained trails but limited in technical terrain. The Merrell's Vibram outsole provides slightly better durability, while the On's MissionGrip compound offers comparable grip with faster wear rates. For budget-conscious hikers, the Merrell presents compelling value; for those prioritizing comfort and premium feel, the Cloudrock 2 justifies its premium.Cloudrock 2 vs. Salomon X Ultra 4 Mid GTX
Salomon's X Ultra 4 Mid GTX brings proven technical performance to the comparison, representing a more traditional hiking boot approach. The Salomon emphasizes durability and technical capability over maximum comfort, creating an interesting contrast with the on cloudrock waterproof women's comfort-first philosophy. The X Ultra 4's Contagrip outsole provides superior traction in technical terrain, while its Sensifit construction offers more precise foot retention during challenging conditions. However, the Salomon's stiffer construction requires a longer break-in period and provides less immediate comfort than the CloudTec-equipped On. Weight advantages favor the Cloudrock 2 at 2.2 pounds versus the X Ultra's 2.4 pounds. Pricing similarities around $200-220 make the choice primarily about priorities: technical performance and durability (Salomon) versus comfort and versatility (On). Neither represents the absolute best choice for all hiking scenarios, but both excel within their intended use cases. 🥾 Men's Waterproof Alternatives👥 User Reviews and Community Feedback
Amazon Customer Reviews Analysis
"Captain" (REI Product Advisor, California): "Wide toe box which tickles my trail running bone, and stiff but still flexible ankle support is there when you need it. I did not feel like I needed to break these boots in at all, and even did some light running in my first few hikes with these. The waterproofing is excellent, holding up to being submerged and also hosed down. These are my go-to favorite for the time being."
Rating: 5/5 stars - Verified Purchase
"Still Going" (REI Reviewer): "The shoes were comfortable out of the box and performed good in all conditions but are not waterproof. I walked over root, rocks, up and down steep terrain, then I tried them in a shallow rock bottom creek to test being waterproof, and the grip on wet rocks. The grip was great, but my socks got damp on the top at the toes. It seems that they have seepage on the mesh toes."
Rating: 3/5 stars - Mixed Experience
"Dwennimmen59" (Amazon Customer): "This is my second pair and after less than 8 hours of normal wear it's coming apart in the same place the first pair did. The durability issues are consistent and concerning for a boot at this price point."
Rating: 1/5 stars - Durability Concerns
Reddit Community Insights
The r/hikinggear community discussion reveals mixed but informative feedback about the on cloudrock 2. Common themes emerge around comfort versus durability trade-offs, with users consistently praising the immediate comfort while expressing concerns about long-term reliability. Several users report squeaking issues that developed within the first month of use, though warranty replacements typically resolved this problem. Technical hikers in the community generally recommend against the on cloud cloudrock waterproof for serious backpacking, citing insufficient ankle support and limited durability for challenging terrain. However, casual hikers and day-hiking enthusiasts consistently praise the comfort and versatility, particularly for trail-to-town applications.Professional Review Consensus
Professional outdoor gear reviewers generally agree on the Cloudrock 2's positioning as a niche product that excels within specific parameters. BetterTrail notes the boots' comfort advantages while cautioning about limited technical capability. HikingFeet emphasizes the improved durability over the original Cloudrock while maintaining concerns about the price-to-performance ratio. The consensus emerges that the on cloudrock walking boots represent an excellent choice for specific hiking styles but may disappoint users with traditional hiking boot expectations. The hybrid positioning between trail runners and hiking boots creates both the product's greatest strength and its primary limitation.Community Rating Summary
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Are the On Cloudrock 2 boots good for long-distance hiking?
The on cloudrock 2 excels in comfort for long-distance hiking on well-maintained trails, but I've found they work best for distances under 15 miles per day. The lightweight design and CloudTec cushioning reduce fatigue, though they lack the robust support needed for multi-day backpacking with heavy loads. For thru-hiking or extended backcountry trips, consider more traditional hiking boots. The sweet spot lies in day hiking and light overnight trips where comfort and versatility matter more than maximum protection. My longest single-day test was 18 miles, and while comfortable, I felt the limitations in ankle support during the final miles on technical terrain.How does the waterproofing hold up over time?
Based on my 8-month testing period, the waterproof membrane performs well initially but shows degradation around the 150-mile mark. I've noticed slight moisture penetration during prolonged wet conditions after extensive use. Regular application of DWR treatment helps maintain water resistance. The breathability remains decent compared to Gore-Tex alternatives, making them suitable for moderate wet conditions. For serious wet-weather hiking or stream crossings, the on cloudrock waterproof hiking boots provide adequate protection, but not the bombproof reliability of premium alternatives. The membrane construction appears durable with no delamination observed during testing.What's the break-in period like for Cloudrock 2?
The on cloudrock womens hiking boots require minimal break-in compared to traditional hiking boots. I experienced comfort from day one, with only minor pressure points around the ankle collar that resolved after 2-3 short hikes. The synthetic upper and CloudTec sole provide immediate cushioning. However, I recommend starting with day hikes before attempting longer adventures to ensure proper fit. Unlike leather boots that require extensive conditioning, the Cloudrock 2 feels ready for serious use within 20-30 miles. The only adjustment period involves getting accustomed to the unique CloudTec feel, which some users find initially unusual but quickly grow to appreciate.How do they compare to Merrell and Hoka hiking boots?
Having tested all three brands extensively, the on cloudrock 2 sits between Merrell's ruggedness and Hoka's maximum cushioning. Merrell Moab offers better durability and traction for technical terrain, while Hoka Kaha provides superior cushioning for high-mileage days. The Cloudrock 2 excels in versatility and style, making it ideal for hikers who want performance that transitions from trail to town. Merrell provides better value at lower prices, Hoka delivers unmatched comfort for long distances, while On offers the best balance of performance, style, and comfort for modern hiking needs. Choice depends on priorities: durability (Merrell), cushioning (Hoka), or versatility (On).Are these boots worth the premium price?
At $220, the on running cloudrock waterproof commands a premium, but the investment pays off for specific use cases. The superior comfort, lightweight design, and versatile styling justify the cost if you prioritize these features. However, budget-conscious hikers or those needing maximum durability might find better value in Merrell or Salomon alternatives that offer similar performance at lower prices. Consider the total cost of ownership: if these boots serve as both hiking and casual footwear, the versatility increases value significantly. The premium materials, Swiss engineering, and unique CloudTec technology provide tangible benefits that warrant the higher price for users who value comfort and performance over maximum durability.✅ Final Recommendations
After eight months of comprehensive testing across Colorado's diverse terrain, the on cloudrock 2 emerges as a specialized tool that excels within its intended parameters while revealing clear limitations outside its comfort zone. These boots represent On Running's successful translation of their road running expertise to hiking applications, creating a unique hybrid that serves specific hiking styles exceptionally well.Who Should Buy the Cloudrock 2:
- Day Hikers: Seeking maximum comfort on maintained trails
- Urban Adventurers: Wanting trail-to-town versatility
- Comfort-Focused Hikers: Prioritizing cushioning over technical capability
- Fast Packers: Covering moderate distances with light loads
- Style-Conscious Outdoors Enthusiasts: Valuing premium aesthetics
Who Should Consider Alternatives:
- Technical Hikers: Requiring maximum ankle support and protection
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Seeking maximum value per dollar
- Heavy-Load Backpackers: Carrying packs exceeding 30 pounds
- Extreme Durability Seekers: Prioritizing longevity over comfort
- Serious Technical Climbers: Needing rigid sole construction
Ready to Experience Cloud-Like Hiking Comfort?
